What is SIN?

Sin' is a demonstration of making somebody or yourself to endure at the season of submitting "it" or later on. In a portion of the "transgressions" – we won't not discover anybody endure out of it but rather, it is only because of our absence of knowledge. For instance on the off chance that "you" do "smoke" then comfortable snapshot of smoking you feel the "kick" out of smoking at the same time, later on you may get some kind of "disease" and you will endure [for more information read - Why Smoking is a Transgression ? on this site]. The same is the situation with a 'transgression'. As a rule of "transgression" we don't see somebody enduring ideal in front be that as it may, somebody will endure later on or at a faraway place as on account of "prostitution" or 'watching motion pictures'. As a rule we neglect to see the "sufferer" of our activities, as we are rationally not sufficiently sharp to acknowledge and besides the "casualty" require not be an individuals but rather, some other 'living thing' as well.

On the off chance that somebody endures because of your demonstration, that you do purposely or unwittingly – then "you" need to endure in like manner. The "wrongdoing" you did onto them will without a doubt return to you later on and as per the 'law of Karma' , the 'law of activity' – in Islam you will endure because of a similar sin that you did to a similar degree with intrigue as well,, in the event that it is postponed. The 'law of Karma' is like the third law of Newton that expresses that – for each activity there is an equivalent and inverse response.

It has been said in the Hindu sacred writings that the 'law of Karma' is relentless and unstoppable of avoidance. When you do demonstration of "good" or "terrible" – there is no real way to escape it, the Hinduism focuses on that even the master can't help you escape out of it, such is the force of activity.

Hinduism asserts that – whatever "great" or "awful" you do with your "idea" or "tongue" or "body" will be come back to you through a similar channel. For instance on the off chance that I kick somebody, in future similar kicks will be given to me by another person or through a similar person. In the event that I "reprove" somebody then it returns to me later on and in the event that I rationally think "sick" for others then in future this will make me to endure as a primary concern. This is retold in the deep rooted saying –whatever you sow that should you harvest. On the off chance that it requires more investment to get in those days the outcomes too will be more, this is like the development of cash in a 'settled store'.

This idea applies to the "terrible" done by you as well as, to the "great" activities too. The "great" and "terrible" need not be Just towards the individuals, but rather towards any living being will check. One may escape from the "law" in the wake of carrying out a "wrongdoing" yet, the universe won't extra you and the consequences of your activities will be conveyed to you with no uncertainty.

Another quality with the "transgression" is that – while doing 'it', it gives you satisfaction in any case, later on it brings you 'tears'. In any case, not at all like this the "great" will give you torment while doing "it" be that as it may, later on it gives you 'delight'. In the stepping stool of life, climbing [doing good] is agonizing be that as it may, in the event that you achieve the top you will get a handle on the delight of it however, sliding down [doing sin] is simple yet, later you won't be satisfied.

The 'law of activity' likewise says that – on the off chance that you do the same "terrible" to various individuals the "wrongdoing" you get back will be distinctive and this will rely on the 'development level' or the "affectability" of the individual you follow up on. On the off chance that I hit a terrible man I will get moderately less "sin" than harming a decent man.

At times, I won't not get the "transgression" because of harming others. For instance, if a "police" man beats a "cheat" will the police recover the outcome? The 'law of activity' says not all that since, what he did is an aspect of his responsibilities. Correspondingly, is a mother erring on the off chance that she beats his wrong doing child? Not in the slightest degree! Since the mother is hitting her child just for his 'great'. These are the special cases given in the sacred texts on the 'law of Karma', the law of activity.

Along these lines, nothing is informal or outlandish in the religions or sacred writings saying something as awful and instructing you not to do "it" for doing a few "activities" [sins] will make you endure later on and not just that, you will be pushed down on the stepping stool of life, the step of advancement on the off chance that you confer such taboo activities, or 'sins'.

Along these lines, if the religions or sacred writings are stating something as "wrongdoing" or to